–Inadequate support for candidates;

–Creating or altering grades for work that is internally evaluated (coursework or portfolio evidence) where there is not enough proof of the candidates’ accomplishments to support the grades assigned or the evaluation choices made;

–Failure to maintain the security of candidate coursework and evidence portfolios;

–Fraudulent certification claims;

–Inappropriate certificate retention;

–Helping students produce work for assessment, especially when the help has the potential to affect the assessment’s results, such as when center employees create the work for the student;

–Presenting fabricated witness statements, for instance, as proof that the student has not produced;

–Allowing a learner’s assignment, task, portfolio, or coursework to contain evidence that the staff member knows is not the learner’s own;

–Enabling and permitting impersonating;

–Misuse of the provisions for unique needs of learners, such as when students are allowed assistance, like an amanuensis, as long as the assistance has the ability to affect the assessment’s results;

–Falsifying documents or certifications, such as through fraud, replacement, or change;

–Fraudulent certificate claims, which involve requesting a certificate before the student has fulfilled all assessment requirements;

–Failure to manage and transfer accurate learner data in accordance with awarding body regulations.